|
Tax Publishers
Shipping line business - Calling into two Indian
ports as part of charter party arrangement - denial of Article 8/24 of the
India Singapore DTAA
Facts:
Assessee was the agent for a Singapore owned entity
which operated a Panama flagged vessel by name MV New Caledonia Maru. As
part of a charter party arrangement the vessel connected and carried cargo
between two Indian ports viz. Mundra and Mumbai. Revenue's plea was that these
were journeys performed between Indian ports only and were not part of the international
carriage of shipping lines and thus as per Section 172 - 7.5% of the freight
revenue was added as taxable freight revenue in India and assessee was called
to pay tax @ 40% as applicable to a non-resident on the same. Assessee's plea
was their principals were a Singapore resident and were liable in Singapore and
the vessel operated on feeder vessel for that one leg and thereafter was
in international waters on various voyages. CIT(A) upheld the views of the AO.
On further appeal -
Held in favour of the assessee that they were eligible for
India - Singapore DTAA - Article 8 exemption for international shipping
business.
Applied:
CIT v. Taurus Shipping Services (Tax Appeal No. 847 to
849 of 2015 order dated 01-12-2015) : 2015 TaxPub(DT) 5090 (Guj-HC).
Case: Magnum
Shipping Services v. ITO 2023 TaxPub(DT) 4639 (Rajkot-Trib)
|